The Smart Move: Why Rutgers’ Top Freshman Is Redshirting the 2025-26 Season (And What It Means for the Team)

Imagine being 18 years old, ranked among the best in the nation, and stepping onto a Big Ten court with the weight of expectations on your shoulders. Now imagine your coach pulling you aside and saying, “We’re sitting you out this year.” Would you panic? Or would you see the bigger picture?

That’s exactly the scenario unfolding at Rutgers, where a highly-touted freshman—one of the most exciting recruits in program history—has decided to redshirt the 2025-26 season. At first glance, it might seem like a setback. But in college basketball, where development and timing are everything, this could be the most strategic play of the year. Here’s why.

A calculated pause: Rutgers’ freshman phenom takes a year to sharpen his game.

Why Redshirting a Top Freshman Is a Bold (But Brilliant) Gamble

Redshirting—a term borrowed from the red shirts worn by non-competing athletes—isn’t new, but it’s rare for five-star recruits or McDonald’s All-Americans. So why would Rutgers, a program on the rise, bench its most hyped newcomer? Let’s break it down.

The Physical Chess Game: Body vs. Big Ten

College basketball isn’t just faster than high school—it’s heavier. The average Big Ten forward is 6’8”, 230 pounds of muscle, experience, and very few mercy rules. For even the most elite freshmen, the jump can be jarring.

Take Chet Holmgren, the 2022 No. 1 pick. Despite his skill, he weighed just 195 pounds as a freshman at Gonzaga. A redshirt year could’ve added the strength he needed to dominate earlier. Rutgers’ freshman, while talented, might be making the same calculation: one year of weight training > four years of playing catch-up.

The Mental Edge: Learning Without the Spotlight

Ever tried learning calculus while someone yells in your ear? That’s what freshmen face in high-pressure programs. By redshirting, this player gets:

• A full year to study Rutgers’ system without the pressure of game-day mistakes.
• Film sessions with coaches, breaking down opponents like a grad student.
• No “bust” label if his stats don’t immediately match the hype.

As former Duke star Jayson Tatum once said: “The game slows down when you’re not forced to play before you’re ready.”

The Team First Play: Rutgers’ Long Game

Rutgers isn’t just thinking about 2025-26—they’re building for 2026-27 and beyond. If this freshman redshirts, he’ll:

• Enter the lineup as a sophomore with a year of college-level reps under his belt.
• Avoid burning a year of eligibility on a team that might not be a Final Four contender yet.
• Potentially reclassify later if he develops faster than expected (see: Lamelo Ball’s path).

It’s the basketball equivalent of a startup in stealth mode—quietly leveling up before the big launch.

Redshirt Success Stories (And a Few Cautionary Tales)

History shows that redshirting high-profile freshmen can be a masterstroke—or a misfire. Here’s the scorecard:

✅ The Wins: When Patience Paid Off

• Blake Griffin (Oklahoma, 2007-08): Injured as a freshman, redshirted, then returned to win National Player of the Year and become the No. 1 pick.
• Joel Embiid (Kansas, 2013-14): Redshirted due to injury, then dominated for one season before becoming a top-3 pick.
• Evan Mobley (USC, 2020-21): Not a redshirt, but his one-and-done year after a developmental gap made him the No. 3 pick.

❌ The Risks: When It Backfires

• Renardo Sidney (Mississippi State, 2009-10): Academic issues forced a redshirt, but his career never lived up to the No. 1 recruit hype.
• Cliff Alexander (Kansas, 2014-15): Injuries and a redshirt year led to a short-lived NBA career.

The difference? Injuries vs. strategy. Rutgers’ freshman is choosing this path proactively—not because he’s hurt, but because he’s smart.

What This Means for Rutgers Basketball (And the Big Ten)

Short-Term: The 2025-26 Ripple Effect

Without their prized recruit, Rutgers might:

• Lean harder on returning players like Dereck Lively II (if he stays) or transfers.
• Use the year to develop younger bench players who’ll later complement the redshirt freshman.
• Avoid the “one-and-done” pressure that can disrupt team chemistry.

Think of it like a sabbatical year for a professor—less immediate output, but richer long-term knowledge.

Long-Term: A 2026-27 Power Move

Fast-forward to next season. If this plan works, Rutgers could have:

• A sophomore phenom with a year of college-level training.
• A deeper roster with experienced role players.
• A recruiting pitch that says, “We develop players right—not just fast.”

In a conference where Michigan State and Purdue reload annually, this could be Rutgers’ way to out-strategize the blue bloods.

How Redshirting Works: A Quick Guide for Fans

Still fuzzy on the rules? Here’s the breakdown:

📜 The NCAA Redshirt Rules (Simplified)

• Medical Redshirt: For injuries (must miss most of the season).
• Academic Redshirt: If a player doesn’t meet eligibility requirements.
• Voluntary Redshirt: What Rutgers’ freshman is doing—choosing to sit out to develop.

Key point: The player cannot appear in more than 4 games (NCAA’s “redshirt flexibility” rule) or the year counts.

💡 Why Don’t More Top Recruits Do This?

• Ego: “I’m too good to sit.” (See: Zion Williamson—no redshirt needed.)
• NBA Draft Pressure: One-and-done culture pushes players to prove themselves ASAP.
• Fan Expectations: Schools sell tickets on star freshmen (e.g., Duke’s “Cam Reddish Effect”).

Rutgers is betting that delayed gratification > instant hype.

What’s Next? 3 Storylines to Watch

1. The “Secret Scrimmage” Factor

Even though he won’t play in games, this freshman can practice with the team. Watch for:

• Viral practice clips (a la Bronny James at USC).
• Coach Steve Pikiell dropping hints about his progress.

2. The Transfer Portal Wildcard

If Rutgers adds a graduate transfer or another big-name recruit, the 2026-27 lineup could be scary. Imagine a frontcourt with:

• The redshirt freshman (now stronger and wiser).
• A veteran transfer (e.g., a Big Ten sixth-man type).
• Returning guards with another year of experience.

3. The NBA Draft Dominoes

If this player explodes in 2026-27, he could:

• Become a lottery pick (like Paolo Banchero after one year at Duke).
• Boost Rutgers’ rep as an NBA factory (see: Villanova’s development pipeline).

Should More Top Recruits Consider Redshirting?

This move could start a trend—or remain a rarity. Here’s who should think about it:

✔️ Do It If...

• You’re skinny for your position (e.g., a 6’10” forward under 210 lbs).
• Your team is young or rebuilding (no rush to contribute).
• You love the school and want to maximize your college experience.

❌ Skip It If...

• You’re a surefire NBA lottery pick (e.g., Victor Wembanyama).
• Your team is a title contender now (e.g., UConn in 2023-24).
• You thrive under pressure (some players need the fire of real games).

The Big Picture: Why This Matters Beyond Rutgers

This isn’t just about one player or one season. It’s a cultural shift in how college basketball values:

• Development over hype: In an era of NIL and instant fame, Rutgers is saying, “We’ll wait.”
• Loyalty over one-and-done: A redshirt freshman is more likely to stay 2-3 years than bolt after one season.
• Coaching over recruiting: Pikiell’s reputation as a player developer gets a boost.

If this works, we might see more top recruits asking: “Do I need to rush?” And that could change the game.

Your Turn: What Do You Think?

Is Rutgers making a genius move or taking an unnecessary risk? Would you redshirt if you were a five-star recruit? Drop your take in the comments!

And if you loved this breakdown, don’t miss:

• Related: How NIL Money Is Changing Recruiting (For Better or Worse)
• Related: The Rise of the Transfer Portal: Who Wins and Who Loses?

Want more insider takes on college basketball? Hit subscribe for weekly deep dives on recruits, strategies, and the stories behind the stats. Join the newsletter here—it’s free, and we don’t spam!